Let's be honest, figuring out Chicago citation examples can feel like trying to assemble IKEA furniture without the pictures. You know the pieces are supposed to fit somewhere, but the instructions are... cryptic. Was that comma supposed to be there? Did the author's middle initial go inside the parenthesis or outside? Why does one tiny detail feel like a potential academic landmine? If you've ever stared blankly at a citation style guide, wondering if you'll ever get it right, you're definitely not alone. I remember sweating over my first major Chicago-style bibliography – convinced I'd get marked down for every misplaced period.
This guide? It’s here to cut through the confusion. Forget dry, robotic explanations. We're going to look at *real* Chicago citation examples you'll actually use – books, websites, journal articles, weird sources like podcasts or TikTok videos (yes, really!), and even translate those pesky footnotes into bibliography entries. Think of this as your cheat sheet, written by someone who’s made the mistakes so you don’t have to. We'll cover the Notes-Bibliography system (the one with the footnotes or endnotes) because frankly, that's the one folks usually mean when they Google "Chicago citation example".
Getting Grounded: Notes vs. Bibliography (It's Simpler Than It Sounds)
Before we dive into specific Chicago citation examples, let's clear up how Chicago actually works. It uses two main parts working together:
- Footnotes or Endnotes: These are the little superscript numbers you put right after a quote or paraphrased idea in your text (like this1). Each number corresponds to a note at the bottom of the page (footnote) or at the end of your chapter/document (endnote). The note gives the *full* publication details the first time you cite a source. Think of it as the detailed ID card for that source at the exact spot you used it.
- Bibliography: This is the master list at the *very end* of your paper. It includes every source you cited *and* any important sources you consulted, all alphabetized by the author's last name. The bibliography entry format is slightly different from the note entry – mainly punctuation and author name order. It's the comprehensive directory.
Why both? Footnotes let your reader instantly check your source without flipping pages. The bibliography gives them the full context and a way to find the source themselves. You *need* both for a complete Chicago setup.
Your First Chicago Citation Example: The Basic Book
Let's start with the most common source: a book. Imagine you're citing Malcolm Gladwell's "Outliers." Here’s how it breaks down:
First Footnote/Endnote:
1. Malcolm Gladwell, Outliers: The Story of Success (New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2008), 45.
Subsequent Note (for the same source, cited later):
3. Gladwell, Outliers, 112.
Bibliography Entry:
Gladwell, Malcolm. Outliers: The Story of Success. New York: Little, Brown and Company, 2008.
See the differences? The note has commas, the publication details are in parentheses, and it includes the specific page number you referenced. The bibliography uses periods, reverses the author's name, and omits the page number (it covers the whole book). Pretty straightforward, right? But things get trickier when authors have editors, multiple authors, or no authors at all. That’s where a solid Chicago citation example saves the day.
Beyond the Basics: Common Book Variations
Books aren't always simple single-author affairs. Let’s tackle some frequent wrinkles:
Two or Three Authors:
First Note: 2. Steven D. Levitt and Stephen J. Dubner, Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything, rev. ed. (New York: William Morrow, 2006), 78.
Bibliography: Levitt, Steven D., and Stephen J. Dubner. Freakonomics: A Rogue Economist Explores the Hidden Side of Everything. Rev. ed. New York: William Morrow, 2006.
Note the "and" before the last author in both note and bibliography.
Four or More Authors: Chicago prefers "et al." (meaning "and others") in the notes after the first author's name. List all authors in the bibliography.
First Note: 4. Richard H. Thaler et al., Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008), 210.
Bibliography: Thaler, Richard H., Cass R. Sunstein, John P. Balz, and David Laibson. Nudge: Improving Decisions About Health, Wealth, and Happiness. New Haven: Yale University Press, 2008.
Edited Book (with an Author): The editor credit comes after the book title.
First Note: 5. Jane Austen, Pride and Prejudice, ed. James Kinsley (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004), 120.
Bibliography: Austen, Jane. Pride and Prejudice. Edited by James Kinsley. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2004.
Chapter in an Edited Book: This is super common in academic writing. Cite the *chapter* author and title first, then the book info starting with "in."
First Note: 6. Sarah Ahmed, "Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology," in The Routledge Queer Studies Reader, ed. Donald E. Hall and Annamarie Jagose (London: Routledge, 2013), 246.
Bibliography: Ahmed, Sarah. "Orientations: Toward a Queer Phenomenology." In The Routledge Queer Studies Reader, edited by Donald E. Hall and Annamarie Jagose, 242–258. London: Routledge, 2013.
Notice the page range for the chapter is included in the bibliography here (242–258). Crucial detail!
Sometimes, finding the right Chicago citation example feels like searching for a unicorn. Why can't publishers just stick to one format?
Chicago Citation Example for Journal Articles: Print vs. Online
Journal articles are core research sources. Chicago handles them slightly differently depending on whether you accessed them in print or online (through a database like JSTOR or the journal's own website). Let's compare.
A Classic Print Journal Article
First Note: 7. Elizabeth Anderson, "Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions," Social Epistemology 26, no. 2 (2012): 166.
Bibliography: Anderson, Elizabeth. "Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions." Social Epistemology 26, no. 2 (2012): 163–73.
Key points: Volume number (26), issue number (no. 2), year in parentheses (2012), page number(s) – specific page in note (166), page range in bibliography (163–73).
An Article Accessed Online (via Database or Journal Website)
This is where many folks stumble. You need to include either a DOI (Digital Object Identifier – the gold standard) or a stable URL. Avoid database URLs like EBSCOhost paths! They often require login and aren't permanent.
First Note: 8. Thomas Piketty and Emmanuel Saez, "Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998," Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 1 (February 2003): 1–39, https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135.
Bibliography: Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez. "Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998." Quarterly Journal of Economics 118, no. 1 (February 2003): 1–39. https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135.
See how the DOI replaces the page range in the note? It's included at the end in both. If there's no DOI, use the stable URL for the article on the journal's website. If you accessed it online but it's identical to the print version (common with PDFs from databases), you might omit the URL/DOI, but including it is generally safest.
| Article Element | Print Example | Online with DOI/URL Example |
|---|---|---|
| Author(s) | Anderson, Elizabeth | Piketty, Thomas, and Emmanuel Saez |
| Article Title | "Epistemic Justice as a Virtue of Social Institutions" | "Income Inequality in the United States, 1913–1998" |
| Journal Title | Social Epistemology | Quarterly Journal of Economics |
| Volume/Issue | 26, no. 2 | 118, no. 1 |
| Date | (2012) | (February 2003) |
| Pages (Note) | : 166. | : 1–39, |
| Pages (Bib) | : 163–73. | : 1–39. |
| Access Info | [N/A] | https://doi.org/10.1162/00335530360535135. |
That DOI vs. URL thing trips everyone up initially. I definitely spent way too long figuring that out during grad school.
Demystifying Websites & Online Sources: A Chicago Citation Example Minefield
Ah, websites. The trickiest beast in the Chicago jungle. Why? Because websites rarely provide all the neat information a book or journal article does – author, date, publisher are often hidden or non-existent. Chicago 17th edition has specific guidance for this messy reality. The core principle? Include what you can find. Aim for Author (if known), "Page Title," Site Owner/Sponsor, Publication/Revision Date or Access Date (if no publication date), URL.
Citing a Standard Web Page (With Author and Date)
First Note: 9. Sarah Zhang, "The Sneaky Psychology of Restaurant Menus," The Atlantic, January 18, 2018, https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/01/the-psychology-of-restaurant-menus/550721/.
Bibliography: Zhang, Sarah. "The Sneaky Psychology of Restaurant Menus." The Atlantic, January 18, 2018. https://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2018/01/the-psychology-of-restaurant-menus/550721/.
Citing a Web Page Without a Clear Author
Sometimes the author is an organization.
First Note: 10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, "Healthy Weight, Nutrition, and Physical Activity," last reviewed June 3, 2022, https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/index.html.
Bibliography: Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. "Healthy Weight, Nutrition, and Physical Activity." Last reviewed June 3, 2022. https://www.cdc.gov/healthyweight/index.html.
Citing a Web Page Without *Any* Author
Start with the title. Use an access date if there's no publication/revision date.
First Note: 11. "History of the Eiffel Tower," Office de Tourisme de Paris, accessed March 15, 2023, https://parisjetaime.com/eng/article/history-of-the-eiffel-tower-a117.
Bibliography: "History of the Eiffel Tower." Office de Tourisme de Paris. Accessed March 15, 2023. https://parisjetaime.com/eng/article/history-of-the-eiffel-tower-a117.
Warning: Citing social media, forums, or comment sections? Proceed with extreme caution in academic work. They are often considered ephemeral or lack authoritative authorship. If you must, Chicago 17th has specific formats (e.g., @Username, "Text of post," Platform, Date, URL). Always check if a more authoritative source exists!
Weird and Wonderful Sources: Chicago Citation Examples You Might Actually Need
Research rarely sticks to books and articles. Let’s tackle some curveballs using Chicago citation examples:
YouTube Video:
First Note: 12. Vox, "Why the Metric System Matters," YouTube video, 6:59, July 16, 2016, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bUVjJWA6Vw.
Bibliography: Vox. "Why the Metric System Matters." YouTube video, 6:59. July 16, 2016. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7bUVjJWA6Vw.
Note: "Vox" is the channel/organizational author. If a specific individual creator is prominent, use their name.
Podcast Episode:
First Note: 13. Malcolm Gladwell, "The Dog Will See You Now," episode 1, season 1, Revisionist History, podcast audio, June 16, 2016, https://revisionisthistory.com/seasons?season=1.
Bibliography: Gladwell, Malcolm. "The Dog Will See You Now." Episode 1, season 1 of Revisionist History. Podcast audio, June 16, 2016. https://revisionisthistory.com/seasons?season=1.
Personal Interview (Conducted by You):
First Note: 14. Jane Doe (local historian), interview by author, Chicago, IL, April 10, 2023.
Bibliography: Usually omitted for personal interviews in Chicago Notes-Bib style as they aren't recoverable by readers. Cite them only in the notes.
Government Report (Online):
First Note: 15. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans, 2nd ed. (Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018), 45, https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf.
Bibliography: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Physical Activity Guidelines for Americans. 2nd ed. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, 2018. https://health.gov/sites/default/files/2019-09/Physical_Activity_Guidelines_2nd_edition.pdf.
Finding the right format for these less common sources often requires guessing based on similar formats. It can be a headache.
Why Details Matter: Common Chicago Citation Example Mistakes (And How to Dodge Them)
Let's be real, Chicago has quirks. Here are the pitfalls I see most often (and have definitely stepped in myself):
- Authors: Full Name vs. Last Name Only: Bibliography entries start with the author's Last Name, First Name. Notes start with First Name Last Name. Mixing this up is super common.
- The Italics Trap: Book titles, journal titles, website names (like The Atlantic), podcast titles – these get italicized. Article titles, chapter titles, web page titles – these go in "quotation marks". Don't italicize the quotes!
- Comma Chaos vs. Period Peace: Notes use commas to separate most elements (Author, Title, (Publication Info), Page). Bibliography entries use periods (Author. Title. Publication Info.).
- Page Numbers: Specific vs. Range: Notes list the exact page you cited (p. 45). Bibliography entries usually list the full page range for articles or chapters (pp. 163–73), or omit them entirely for whole books.
- DOI/URL Ambiguity: For online articles, include a DOI if available (preferably as a URL: https://doi.org/xxxx). If no DOI, use a stable/permanent URL (not the database search URL!). Put it at the end.
- Missing Information Panic: No author? Start with the title. No date? Use "n.d." and an access date (e.g., accessed March 15, 2023). No publisher? Sometimes the website title or sponsor fills that role. Do your best detective work.
- Forgetting the "In" for Chapters: When citing a chapter, the book title must be preceded by "in".
Bibliography vs. Works Cited? Minor Rant.
Chicago uses "Bibliography." MLA uses "Works Cited." APA uses "References." They are not synonyms! Using the wrong heading label is a small but noticeable error. Stick with "Bibliography" for Chicago Notes-Bib.
Chicago Citation Example FAQ: Your Burning Questions Answered
Based on what folks actually search for and ask professors, here are some common Chicago citation example questions:
Q: How do I cite a source with multiple authors in the bibliography?
A: List all authors, inverted (Last name, First name) for the first author, then regular order (First name Last name) for subsequent authors. Use commas and and before the last author:
King, Stephen, Peter Straub, and J. K. Rowling.
Q: Where does the access date go in a Chicago citation example for a website?
A: Only use an access date ("Accessed Month Day, Year") if the webpage lacks a publication date, revision date, or copyright date. Put it right before the URL in both the note and bibliography.
Q: Do I need to include the place of publication (city) for books?
A: Yes, Chicago still requires the city of publication for books. Follow it with a colon before the publisher's name (e.g., New York: Penguin Books). If multiple cities are listed, use the first one.
Q: How do I cite a PDF I downloaded?
A: Cite it based on what it *is*, not the file type. Is it a journal article PDF? Cite it as a journal article, including the DOI/URL. Is it a standalone report? Cite it as a report, including the URL where you found it. Avoid describing formats like "PDF" unless it's genuinely significant and distinct.
Q: What's the difference between "ibid." and "op. cit."? Do I even need them?
A: Chicago 17th edition strongly discourages using Latin abbreviations like "ibid." (meaning "in the same place") and "op. cit." (meaning "in the work cited"). Instead, use the Shortened Citation format we saw earlier: Author Last Name, Shortened Title, Page Number. It's clearer for readers. So, skip the Latin!
Q: Are citation generators reliable for a perfect Chicago citation example?
A: They can be a starting point, but never trust them blindly. I've seen them mess up author order, italics, punctuation, and DOIs constantly. Always double-check the generator's output against the official Chicago rules (or a trusted guide like this one!). Consider them assistants, not experts.
Q: How do I cite ChatGPT or other AI-generated text?
A: This is still evolving territory. Chicago Manual of Style officially recommends treating it like personal communication (since the content isn't recoverable and can't be verified). Cite it in a note only, explaining the prompt used. Always check with your instructor or publisher first – many prohibit or strictly limit citing AI-generated content due to plagiarism and verification concerns.
The AI citation question is a big messy one right now. Most academics I know are either banning it outright or setting very strict rules.
Essential Tools & Resources (Beyond Just Chicago Citation Examples)
Knowing the rules is half the battle. Here are tools I actually use or recommend (warts and all):
- The Official Source: The Chicago Manual of Style, 17th Edition. Expensive, but the definitive guide. Most university libraries have online access. The online version (Chicago Manual of Style Online) is searchable – invaluable for obscure questions.
- Purdue Online Writing Lab (OWL): A fantastic free resource. Their Chicago Guide (https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/research_and_citation/chicago_manual_17th_edition/cmos_formatting_and_style_guide/chicago_manual_of_style_17th_edition.html) is clear, well-organized, and packed with examples. My go-to quick reference.
- Zotero: Free, open-source citation management software. It captures metadata from websites, databases, PDFs (often imperfectly!), and generates citations and bibliographies in Word/LibreOffice. HUGE time-saver, but ALWAYS verify the output, especially for Chicago. It handles the grunt work, you handle the quality control.
- University Library Guides: Search for "Chicago citation [Your University Name]". Librarians often create excellent discipline-specific or example-rich guides. These are gold.
Pro Tip: Build your bibliography as you research, not at the end! Using Zotero or even just a dedicated Word doc saves you frantic last-minute formatting nightmares.
Wrapping Up: Confidence Over Perfection
Look, mastering every single Chicago citation example nuance takes time. Even seasoned academics double-check rules. The goal isn't robotic perfection on the first try; it's understanding the core logic – identifying the author, title, container (like the book or journal), publication details, and location (page or URL) – and applying it consistently.
Use the concrete examples here as templates. Bookmark the Purdue OWL link. Consider using Zotero to manage the chaos. And remember, the point of citation isn't just to avoid plagiarism (though that's crucial!). It's to build your credibility by showing your sources, and to give your readers a clear path to explore those sources further. It's a sign of respect for the ideas you're engaging with.
So next time you need a Chicago citation example, take a breath. You've got this. Identify the source type, find a similar example, gather the details, and piece it together using the punctuation patterns. It gets easier, I promise. Now, go cite confidently!
Leave a Message