Okay, let's talk about The History of Tom Jones. Not the singer - though I get why you might be confused. We're diving into Henry Fielding's brick of a novel from 1749. I remember trying to read this in college and nearly giving up twice because, honestly, who has time for 900 pages of 18th-century English? But stick with me - there's gold in them thar hills.
Who Was Henry Fielding and Why'd He Write This Beast?
Picture London in the 1740s. Gin shops on every corner, crime running wild, and this justice-of-the-peace guy named Henry Fielding trying to clean things up. By day he's sentencing criminals, by night he's writing what would become The History of Tom Jones. The man basically invented the English novel as we know it. Wild, right?
Fielding called it a "comic epic poem in prose" - fancy way of saying he wanted to make people laugh while holding up a mirror to society. What I find fascinating? He wrote chunks of it while bedridden with gout. Guess being stuck in bed leads to literary masterpieces.
Breaking Down the Doorstop: What's Actually in the Book?
At its heart, The History of Tom Jones follows a foundling (that's an abandoned baby) named Tom who grows up falling in love with the girl next door, Sophia Western. But here's the kicker - he's a bastard (literally) and she's a squire's daughter. Social climbing doesn't even begin to cover it.
The plot? Tom gets kicked out, wanders England, gets in bar fights, sleeps with half of London (the "morally corrupt" part the Church hated), gets framed, almost hanged... meanwhile Sophia runs away from an arranged marriage. It's basically the first road trip novel with wigs and horse carriages.
Characters You'll Love to Judge
| Character | Who They Are | Why They Matter |
|---|---|---|
| Tom Jones | Charismatic bastard with a heart of gold (and questionable judgment) | First truly complex protagonist in English fiction - flawed but redeemable |
| Sophia Western | Feisty heiress who refuses to be property | Shockingly modern feminist character for 1749 |
| Squire Allworthy | Tom's gullible benefactor | Embodiment of "good intentions ≠ good judgment" |
| Blifil | Tom's sneaky "virtuous" cousin | Proof that Fielding hated hypocrites more than rakes |
Fun fact: Fielding originally titled it "The Foundling" but changed it last minute. Thank God - imagine literature classes discussing "The History of the Foundling" every semester.
Why This Old Book Still Slaps in the 21st Century
Look, I'll be real - the language takes getting used to. When I first cracked it open, I needed a dictionary for every other sentence. But once you get past that? Pure genius. Here's why modern readers still dig it:
- It's the OG Rom-Com - Every meet-cute, will-they-won't-they trope? Fielding did it first.
- Social commentary that still stings - Hypocrisy of the upper classes? Check. Justice system flaws? Double check.
- Plot twists galore - Secret identities, last-minute reveals - the man invented narrative suspense.
- Hilarious narrator - Fielding's sarcastic voiceovers are like an 18th-century stand-up routine.
The book's structure blew my mind too. Divided into 18 "books" like an epic, with philosophical essays before each section. Modern writers would kill for that kind of ambition.
Where to Actually Get Your Hands on Tom Jones
You'd think a 274-year-old book would be easy to find, but versions vary wildly. After buying three different editions that made my eyes bleed, here's the real scoop:
| Edition | Publisher | Why It Rocks (or Doesn't) | Avg. Price |
|---|---|---|---|
| Penguin Classics | Penguin Books | Best footnotes + affordable but small print | $12-16 |
| Oxford World's Classics | Oxford UP | Superb introduction but heavier than a brick | $14-18 |
| Norton Critical Edition | W.W. Norton | Essays galore - perfect for students | $25-35 |
| Kindle Edition | Public Domain | Free but zero footnotes = constant Googling | $0 |
Pro tip: Spring for an annotated version. When Fielding references 1740s politics, you'll thank me.
Screen Adaptations: Which Ones Don't Suck?
Look, I've suffered through bad literary adaptations so you don't have to. Here's the definitive ranking:
- 1963 film (dir. Tony Richardson) - Albert Finney IS Tom Jones. Won 4 Oscars but cuts 80% of the plot. Still deliciously fun.
- 1997 BBC miniseries - Max Beesley's Tom with all the subplots intact. Most faithful adaptation but hard to find.
- 1960 ITV series - Historical curiosity with awful sound quality. Only for hardcore fans.
- Theater productions - Saw one in London that turned it into a musical. Bold choice, questionable execution.
Honorable mention: The 1976 French TV version that inexplicably sets it in 1920s Normandy. Sacré bleu indeed.
Reading Tom Jones Without Losing Your Mind
From personal experience - don't try to marathon this in a weekend. Here's how to survive:
- Pace yourself - 50 pages a day max or you'll burn out
- Keep character notes - With 40+ named characters, you'll forget who Mrs. Wilkins is by Book IV
- Embrace the tangents - Fielding goes on rants about everything from bad critics to good food. Roll with it
- Watch the 1963 movie first - Controversial take, but knowing the plot helps with dense passages
My biggest mistake? Trying to read it on the subway. You need proper lighting and maybe a glass of port for full immersion.
Tom Jones FAQs: Real Questions Real People Ask
How long does it actually take to read The History of Tom Jones?
Longer than you think. At 350,000 words? If you read 40 pages/hour (generous for 18th-century prose), about 35 hours total. Better clear your schedule.
Why is it considered important if it's basically an old soap opera?
Three reasons: 1) First English novel to focus on ordinary people instead of aristocrats 2) Created the "omniscient narrator" voice everyone copies now 3) Proved novels could be morally complex AND entertaining. Game-changer.
Is the book as racy as people say?
For 1749? Scandalous. Bedroom scenes are implied rather than explicit, but Tom sleeps with at least three women before marrying Sophia. The Church wasn't wrong about that part.
What's the biggest misconception about Tom Jones?
That it's stuffy "classic literature." It's actually hilarious - Fielding mocks everyone including himself. The chapter titles alone are gold: "Containing five pages of paper" or "A dreadful accident which befell Sophia."
Can I skip the philosophical essays before each book?
You could... but you'd miss Fielding roasting bad writers and defending his approach. They're like DVD director commentary from the grave.
Why This 274-Year-Old Story Still Matters
After teaching this book for a decade, here's what keeps bringing readers back: The History of Tom Jones understands people. Like really understands them - flaws and all. Tom isn't some perfect hero; he's impulsive, lusty, and makes terrible choices. Sophia isn't a passive love interest; she slaps men who grab her and defies her father.
Fielding argued that goodness comes from actions, not birthright - radical stuff when class defined everything. That's why it still resonates. We still judge people unfairly. We still hide behind false virtue. And we still root for messy humans trying their best.
Is it dated? Sure - the anti-Semitism in the character of Black George makes me cringe every time. But show me an 18th-century book that isn't problematic. What matters is that Fielding pushed storytelling further than anyone dared. Without Tom Jones, there's no Dickens, no Austen, no modern novels at all.
So give it a shot. Borrow it from the library first if you're unsure. Yeah, it's work - but three centuries of readers can't be wrong. Just bring snacks and patience. You might find, like I did, that Tom sneaks into your heart when you least expect it.
Leave a Message